With the next general election looming ever faster on the 4th July, the topic of pensions has been of high concern and discussion.
State and private pensions make up the vast majority of income for those over the state pension age. There is therefore intense political interest in how previous (or proposed) pensions reforms affect pensioners, and in the economic fortunes of older people more generally.
Whoever is voted in, will be making big decisions on pension policy. With some fearing, certain governments will be taxing them heavily.
PENSIONS
It is worth noting at this time, that both the Conservatives and Labour have committed to the pensions triple lock. This ensures the state pension rises by the highest of average earnings growth, inflation or 2.5 per cent.
Speculation says there is possible planned state pension age increases will also come into focus for the next administration, following an independent review.
The current state pension age is 66, with plans in place to raise this to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2046. However rumours circulated that this could come into effect earlier than planned.
LIFETIME ALLOWANCE
Another policy up for contention is the lifetime allowance. This has been scrapped by the Conservatives this year but Labour has previously stated it will reintroduce it.
This could, directly counter wider efforts to boost investing, as any lifetime allowance tax charge would punish those who enjoy strong investment growth.
By their very nature pensions are a tool for long-term planning. The pensions industry has also been patiently waiting for reform to be made to auto-enrolment.
There have been recommendations to lower the minimum age for auto-enrolment from 22 to 18 and lose the lower qualifying earnings band, but this has not been acted upon.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS OF THE NEXT GOVERNMENT
Increased state pension age and additional support to those not able to work up to an
This is a topic of great importance to the country, as the state pension age will rise from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028. The government will also have to finalise the timing of the increase in the state pension age to 68. If it chooses to accept the recommendation of a previous independent review to bring the increase forward to the late 2030s, then those directly affected should be notified in the next few years (in line with the current government’s sensible commitment to provide at least 10 years’ notice of any change). Increasing the state pension age is a coherent response to increases in longevity at older ages, and one that other countries are also adopting. But it affects poorer people more, as well as those who find it more difficult to remain in paid work at older ages.
A long-term plan is needed for the level of the state pension.
The triple lock, which both Conservative and Labour parties have suggested they will maintain, increases the level and cost of the state pension in an uncertain, and ultimately unsustainable, way. Current forecasts suggest maintaining the triple lock will cost around £1.5 billion per year by 2029–30 relative to earnings indexation, although the triple lock could cost less, or (as has been the case in recent years) far more than forecast. A better way forward is possible, where the government decides on the appropriate level of the state pension and then increases it to keep up with average earnings growth in the long run, but also commits to increase it by at least at the rate of inflation every year.
Legislated increases in minimum pension contributions. If they do, they should carefully consider the timing, as well as potential alterations to the policy to help low earners adjust to lower take-home pay.
The Pensions (Extension of Automatic Enrolment) Act was passed in 2023 but has not yet been implemented by the government. It would extend automatic enrolment to 18- to 21-year-olds and abolish the lower earnings limit for qualifying earnings. This latter change means additional total contributions of £499 per year (including from the employer and tax relief) for people with minimum contributions (8% of qualifying pay). For someone earning £10,000, this would lead to a reduction in take-home pay of at least 2.5% (£250), and likely more depending on how much wages adjust downwards given the policy.
A long-term policy solution to support pension saving among the self-employed.
Low rates of private pension participation for self-employed workers remains an unresolved concern. Around 20% of self-employed workers participate in a private pension, down from 50% in 1998. More employees earning less than £10,000 (and therefore not targeted by automatic enrolment) are saving in a pension (25%) than the self-employed. More needs to be done to make it easier for self-employed workers to save in a private pension (and for those who are already saving to save more), potentially by integrating pension saving into the Self Assessment system for self-employed people.
Private Pensions
The next government should develop policies to help people draw on their private pension wealth appropriately. This could mean requiring pension schemes to provide people with decumulation pathways, including solutions that combine annuities with accessible savings pots. The government could also require schemes to provide default options, to ensure that these policies also work better for those who don’t engage actively with their pension. This is because, while the ‘pension freedoms’ reforms of 2015 have opened up opportunities for additional flexibility, they also expose more people to longevity risk (running out of private resources due to living longer than expected), and to more difficulties managing their incomes at older age.
Pensions
With the next general election looming ever faster on the 4th July, the topic of pensions has been of high concern and discussion.
State and private pensions make up the vast majority of income for those over the state pension age. There is therefore intense political interest in how previous (or proposed) pensions reforms affect pensioners, and in the economic fortunes of older people more generally.
Whoever is voted in, will be making big decisions on pension policy. With some fearing, certain governments will be taxing them heavily.
PENSIONS
It is worth noting at this time, that both the Conservatives and Labour have committed to the pensions triple lock. This ensures the state pension rises by the highest of average earnings growth, inflation or 2.5 per cent.
Speculation says there is possible planned state pension age increases will also come into focus for the next administration, following an independent review.
The current state pension age is 66, with plans in place to raise this to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2046. However rumours circulated that this could come into effect earlier than planned.
LIFETIME ALLOWANCE
Another policy up for contention is the lifetime allowance. This has been scrapped by the Conservatives this year but Labour has previously stated it will reintroduce it.
This could, directly counter wider efforts to boost investing, as any lifetime allowance tax charge would punish those who enjoy strong investment growth.
By their very nature pensions are a tool for long-term planning. The pensions industry has also been patiently waiting for reform to be made to auto-enrolment.
There have been recommendations to lower the minimum age for auto-enrolment from 22 to 18 and lose the lower qualifying earnings band, but this has not been acted upon.
KEY CONSIDERATIONS OF THE NEXT GOVERNMENT
This is a topic of great importance to the country, as the state pension age will rise from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028. The government will also have to finalise the timing of the increase in the state pension age to 68. If it chooses to accept the recommendation of a previous independent review to bring the increase forward to the late 2030s, then those directly affected should be notified in the next few years (in line with the current government’s sensible commitment to provide at least 10 years’ notice of any change). Increasing the state pension age is a coherent response to increases in longevity at older ages, and one that other countries are also adopting. But it affects poorer people more, as well as those who find it more difficult to remain in paid work at older ages.
The triple lock, which both Conservative and Labour parties have suggested they will maintain, increases the level and cost of the state pension in an uncertain, and ultimately unsustainable, way. Current forecasts suggest maintaining the triple lock will cost around £1.5 billion per year by 2029–30 relative to earnings indexation, although the triple lock could cost less, or (as has been the case in recent years) far more than forecast. A better way forward is possible, where the government decides on the appropriate level of the state pension and then increases it to keep up with average earnings growth in the long run, but also commits to increase it by at least at the rate of inflation every year.
The Pensions (Extension of Automatic Enrolment) Act was passed in 2023 but has not yet been implemented by the government. It would extend automatic enrolment to 18- to 21-year-olds and abolish the lower earnings limit for qualifying earnings. This latter change means additional total contributions of £499 per year (including from the employer and tax relief) for people with minimum contributions (8% of qualifying pay). For someone earning £10,000, this would lead to a reduction in take-home pay of at least 2.5% (£250), and likely more depending on how much wages adjust downwards given the policy.
Low rates of private pension participation for self-employed workers remains an unresolved concern. Around 20% of self-employed workers participate in a private pension, down from 50% in 1998. More employees earning less than £10,000 (and therefore not targeted by automatic enrolment) are saving in a pension (25%) than the self-employed. More needs to be done to make it easier for self-employed workers to save in a private pension (and for those who are already saving to save more), potentially by integrating pension saving into the Self Assessment system for self-employed people.
The next government should develop policies to help people draw on their private pension wealth appropriately. This could mean requiring pension schemes to provide people with decumulation pathways, including solutions that combine annuities with accessible savings pots. The government could also require schemes to provide default options, to ensure that these policies also work better for those who don’t engage actively with their pension. This is because, while the ‘pension freedoms’ reforms of 2015 have opened up opportunities for additional flexibility, they also expose more people to longevity risk (running out of private resources due to living longer than expected), and to more difficulties managing their incomes at older age.
If you have any questions – click here and speak to the Robinsons team
Archives
Categories
Archives
Recent Post
Categories
Portfolio
Meta
Calender